Airports across the United States are quickly adopting new technologies to make the experience of flying as simple as possible for passengers. One of the technologies that is being adopted rather quickly is facial recognition, which has led some people to become rather hesitant about the implications of this technology. On the surface, facial recognition seems like a great way to speed up the process of flying. Already, on some flights you do not need to present any form of identification or even a ticket because a computer system verifies your identity based on your face alone.
A number of different airlines and airports are piloting this technology. JetBlue, for example, has already scanned 150,000 faces and used this information to verify international travelers on their flights. Delta has created a biometric terminal in Atlanta that uses facial recognition at check-in, baggage drops, security, and boarding. With this technology, flights are able to board nearly 10 minutes faster due to the time saved per passenger. While the convenience of this technology is obvious, the hesitation comes with the fact that the technology is largely unproven and involves storing personal information that could possibly be stolen in the future.

Technology Could Be Used to Increase Security and Make Flights Safer
Facial
recognition is an opt-in technology at airports that is only used for
international flights. In other words, American citizens do not need to consent
to having their faces scanned if they do not wish to do so. At the same time,
trading in this personal information for an easier experience at the airport,
which is already a stressful environment, sounds very alluring so it would not
come as a surprise if passengers decide to jump at the chance to get through
security faster. In the future, it is possible that such technology could be
used to increase security and make flights safer, which would offer more reasons
to participate, but as of right now the main question is one of convenience.
The fears of many people were confirmed recently when US
Customers and Border Protection (CBP) announced that photos taken of travelers
had been compromised in an attack on the organization. Officials said that the
images stolen included ones of people’s faces, as well as their license plates.
The attack was actually launched on a federal subcontractor, but it raises the
question of how airports can implement technology like facial recognition if
there is no guarantee that personal information, including a face scan, remains
protected. The images stolen in this event were taken as part of border
defense. While no passport nor travel document images were compromised, the
event has raised concerns when it comes to facial recognition and travel.
How the Current Facial Recognition Model Works
Currently, facial recognition at airports occurs in a different way than it does with the technology that initially put it in the public spotlight: the iPhone. When someone uses Face ID, the process occurs internally over your iPhone, and Apple never receives any information. However, at the JetBlue e-gates, individuals can put their feet on blue markers and look toward a box that takes a picture and transmits it to CBP, which then reports back about whether or not the individual is cleared to board. The system has photos of travelers stored that it compares against photos taken at the gate, and these stored images come mostly from passports and visa applications. For this reason, the technology is only employed on international flights.
At present, the technology is perhaps not as reliable as it should be. While the research about it has been unofficial, it shows that a significant portion—up to 15 percent of passengers—were not approved when they should have been. Furthermore, one passenger was allowed through even while wearing sunglasses when they were trying to test the system.

Some of the Kinks That Need to Be Worked Out
At the same time, people who do not match simply go through the normal process of having their passports checked by an agent, which is not a major disruption. However, this issue could become a bigger one if facial recognition is employed in many different places in an airport. Perhaps the real lesson here is that facial recognition software just needs to improve before it is more widely implemented at airports, particularly for domestic flights.
Another issue that still needs to be worked out is one of security. Given the recent data breach, it is possible that pictures used for convenience could become stolen. Technological improvements are only beneficial when security keeps pace with them and ensures that the convenience offered does not come at a price. Moving forward, it will be interesting to see how the conversation goes in the months and years ahead and what kinds of solutions are offered in terms of keeping data safe, as more airlines begin to adopt the technology.











